Category: DEFAULT

Spielsysteme

spielsysteme

Das gehört momentan zu den vielleicht am häufigsten umgesetzten Spielsystemen im Profifußball. Im Gegensatz zum mit der "Flachen Vier". Taktikprinzipien & Spielsysteme in der Halle. oder oder noch ein ganz anderes System? Wenn in der Halle jeweils vier Feldspieler gegeneinander. Im Fussbal muss zwischen Grundordnung und Spielsystem unterschieden werden. Hier erfährst Du warum und lernst die verschiedenen Grundordnungen und. Eine sehr grosse Fc kaiserlautern kommt auch den Flügelspielern bei der Nutzung einer Dreierkette zu. Diese müssen über eine best online casino japan Laufstärke verfügen, da sie ihre Seite fast alleine abdecken müssen. Juni "Das Fussball-Buch" zum Vorbestellen. Hier findest du ein Lehrbeispiel wie das eingesetzt werden kann, am Beispiel der Nationalmannschaft von Risiko casino youtube gegen Spanien: Improve übersetzung deutsch Zwei 'feste' Verteidiger geben die Aufgabenverteilung in der Defensive fest vor. Beim Umschalten ins Offensivspiel rücken die Sechser wieder heraus.

When used from the start of a game, this formation is widely regarded as encouraging expansive play, and should not be confused with the practice of modifying a 4—4—2 by bringing on an extra forward to replace a midfield player when behind in the latter stages of a game.

This formation is suited for a short passing game and useful for ball retention. A staggered 4—3—3 involving a defensive midfielder usually numbered four or six and two attacking midfielders numbered eight and ten was commonplace in Italy, Argentina, and Uruguay during the s and s.

The Italian variety of 4—3—3 was simply a modification of WM, by converting one of the two wing-halves to a libero sweeper , whereas the Argentine and Uruguayan formations were derived from 2—3—5 and retained the notional attacking centre-half.

The national team that made this famous was the Dutch team of the and World Cups, even though the team won neither.

It was also the formation with which Norwegian manager Nils Arne Eggen won 15 Norwegian league titles. Most teams using this formation now use the specialist defensive midfielder.

Mourinho has also been credited with bringing this formation to England in his first stint with Chelsea. A variation of the 4—3—3 wherein a striker gives way to a central attacking midfielder.

The formation focuses on the attacking midfielder moving play through the centre with the strikers on either side. It is a much narrower setup in comparison to the 4—3—3 and is usually dependent on the "1" to create chances.

This formation was also adopted by Massimiliano Allegri for the —11 Serie A title-winning season for Milan. It was also the favoured formation of Maurizio Sarri during his time at Empoli between and , during which time they won promotion to Serie A and subsequently avoided relegation, finishing 15th in the —15 Serie A season.

A variation of the 4—3—3 with a defensive midfielder, two central midfielders and a fluid front three. The 4—4—2 diamond also described as 4—1—2—1—2 staggers the midfield.

The width in the team has to come from the full-backs pushing forward. The defensive midfielder is sometimes used as a deep lying playmaker, but needs to remain disciplined and protect the back four behind him.

The 4—1—3—2 is a variation of the 4—1—2—1—2 and features a strong and talented defensive centre midfielder. This allows the remaining three midfielders to play further forward and more aggressively, and also allows them to pass back to their defensive mid when setting up a play or recovering from a counterattack.

The 4—1—3—2 gives a strong presence in the forward middle of the pitch and is considered to be an attacking formation. Opposing teams with fast wingers and strong passing abilities can try to overwhelm the 4—1—3—2 with fast attacks on the wings of the pitch before the three offensive midfielders can fall back to help their defensive line.

Valeriy Lobanovskiy is one of the most famous exponents of the formation, using it with Dynamo Kyiv , winning three European trophies in the process.

Another example of the 4—1—3—2 in use was the England national team at the World Cup , managed by Alf Ramsey. The 4—3—2—1, commonly described as the " Christmas Tree " formation, has another forward brought on for a midfielder to play "in the hole", so leaving two forwards slightly behind the most forward striker.

Terry Venables and Christian Gross used this formation during their time in charge of Tottenham Hotspur. Since then, the formation has lost its popularity in England.

In this approach, the middle of the three central midfielders act as a playmaker while one of the attacking midfielders plays in a free role.

However, it is also common for the three midfielders to be energetic shuttlers, providing for the individual talent of the two attacking midfielders ahead.

The "Christmas Tree" formation is considered a relatively narrow formation and depends on full-backs to provide presence in wide areas.

The formation is also relatively fluid. During open play, one of the side central midfielders may drift to the flank to add additional presence.

This formation has three central defenders possibly with one acting as a sweeper. This system merges the winger and full-back positions into the wing-back , whose job it is to work their flank along the full length of the pitch, supporting both the defence and the attack.

A variant of the 5—3—2, this involves a more withdrawn sweeper , who may join the midfield, and more advanced full-backs.

Using a 3—4—3, the midfielders are expected to split their time between attacking and defending. Having only three dedicated defenders means that if the opposing team breaks through the midfield, they will have a greater chance to score than with a more conventional defensive configuration, such as 4—5—1 or 4—4—2.

However, the three forwards allow for a greater concentration on attack. This formation is used by more offensive-minded teams.

Ex-Juventus and Italy coach Antonio Conte successfully implemented the 3—4—3 at Chelsea during the —17 Premier League season, leading the club to the league title and an FA Cup final.

This formation is similar to 5—3—2 except that the two wingmen are oriented more towards the attack. Because of this, the central midfielder tends to remain further back in order to help prevent counter-attacks.

It differs from the classical 3—5—2 of the WW by having a non-staggered midfield. It was used for the first time at international level by the Argentine coach Carlos Bilardo.

Many teams also use a central attacking midfielder and two defensive midfielders, so the midfielders form a "W" formation. Edmilson acted as a sweeper.

Although it had fallen out of favour with most coaches who now prefer four at the back, it had a renaissance in both club and international football in the s.

At club level, it has been effectively used by former Juventus coach Antonio Conte , under whom Juventus won three back-to-back scudetti between and , or by Louis van Gaal at Manchester United.

At international level, it has been used as an alternative formation on two notable occasions to nullify the challenge of possession football used by the Spanish national side.

This was successful in minimizing the Dutch weaknesses inexperience in defence and maximising their strengths world-class forwards in Robin van Persie and Arjen Robben.

This uncommon modern formation focuses on ball possession in the midfield. In fact, it is very rare to see it as an initial formation, as it is more useful for maintaining a lead or tie score.

Its more common variants are 3—4—2—1 or 3—4—3 diamond, which use two wing-backs. The lone forward must be tactically gifted, not only because he focuses on scoring but also on playing the ball back towards the own goal to assist with back passes to his teammates.

Once the team is leading the game, there is an even stronger tactical focus on ball control, short passes and running down the clock.

On the other hand, when the team is losing, at least one of the playmakers will more frequently play in the edge of the area to add depth to the attack.

The formation can be used to grind out 0—0 draws or preserve a lead, as the packing of the centre midfield makes it difficult for the opposition to build up play.

Due to the lone striker, however, the centre of the midfield does have the responsibility of pushing forward as well.

The defensive midfielder will often control the pace of the game. This formation is widely used by Spanish, French and German sides. While it seems defensive to the eye, it is quite a flexible formation, as both the wide players and the full-backs join the attack.

In defence, this formation is similar to either the 4—5—1 or 4—4—1—1. It is used to maintain possession of the ball and stopping opponent attacks by controlling the midfield area of the field.

The lone striker may be very tall and strong to hold the ball up as his midfielders and full-backs join him in attack. The striker could also be very fast.

This formation is used especially when a playmaker is to be highlighted. The variations of personnel used on the flanks in this set-up include using traditional wingers, using inverted wingers or simply using wide midfielders.

Different teams and managers have different interpretations of the 4—2—3—1, but one common factor among them all is the presence of the double pivot.

The double pivot is the usage of two holding midfielders in front of the defence. At the international level, this formation is used by the Belgian , French , Dutch and German national teams in an asymmetric shape, and often with strikers as wide midfielders or inverted wingers.

The formation is also currently used by Brazil as an alternative to the 4—2—4 formation of the late s to Implemented similarly to how original 4—2—4 was used back then, use of this formation in this manner is very offensive, creating a six-man attack and a six-man defence tactical layout.

The front four attackers are arranged as a pair of wide forwards and a playmaker forward who play in support of a lone striker.

In recent years, with full-backs having ever more increasing attacking roles, the wide players be they deep lying forwards, inverted wingers, attacking wide midfielders have been tasked with the defensive responsibility to track and pin down the opposition full-backs.

This formation has been very frequently used by managers all over the world in the modern game. Another notable example at club level is Bayern Munich under Jupp Heynckes.

A highly unconventional formation, the 4—6—0 is an evolution of the 4—2—3—1 or 4—3—3 in which the centre forward is exchanged for a player who normally plays as a trequartista that is, in the "hole".

Suggested as a possible formation for the future of football, [33] the formation sacrifices an out-and-out striker for the tactical advantage of a mobile front four attacking from a position that the opposition defenders cannot mark without being pulled out of position.

Due to these demanding requirements from the attackers, and the novelty of playing without a proper goalscorer, the formation has been adopted by very few teams, and rarely consistently.

This is a particularly defensive formation, with an isolated forward and a packed defence. Again, however, a couple of attacking full-backs can make this formation resemble something like a 3—6—1.

One of the most famous cases of its use is the Euro -winning Greek national team [ citation needed ]. Famously, Japan defeated the heavily favoured Swedish team 3—2 at the Olympics with the unorthodox 1—6—3 formation, before going down 0—8 to Italy.

The formation was dubbed the " kamikaze " formation sometime in the s when former United States national team player Walter Bahr used it for a limited number of games as coach of the Philadelphia Spartans to garner greater media and fan attention for the struggling franchise.

This provides a balance in the distribution of possible moves and adds a dynamic quality to midfield play. This formation was used by former Real Madrid manager Manuel Pellegrini and met with considerable praise.

This formation had been previously used at Real Madrid by Vanderlei Luxemburgo during his failed stint at the club during the latter part of the —05 season and throughout the —06 season.

This formation has been described as being "deeply flawed" [47] and "suicidal". The rectangle becomes a 3—4—3 on the attack because one of the wing-backs moves downfield.

In another sense, the Colombian 4—2—2—2 is closely related to the 4—4—2 diamond of Brazil, style different from the French-Chilean trend and is based on the complementation of a box-to box with 10 classic.

Emphasises the triangulation, but especially in the surprise of attack. The 4—2—2—2 formation consists of the standard defensive four right back, two centre backs, and left back , with two centre midfielders, two support strikers, and two out and out strikers.

The formation has also been used on occasion by the Brazilian national team , [50] [53] [54] notably in the World Cup final.

Bundesliga side RB Leipzig have been using the formation since their promotion in The 3—3—1—3 was formed of a modification to the Dutch 4—3—3 system Ajax had developed.

It requires extreme technical precision and rapid ball circulation since one slip or dispossession can result in a vulnerable counter-attack situation.

Diego Simeone had also tried it occasionally at River Plate. The 3—3—3—1 system is a very attacking formation and its compact nature is ideally suited for midfield domination and ball possession.

It means a coach can field more attacking players and add extra strength through the spine of the team. The attacking three are usually two wing-backs or wingers with the central player of the three occupying a central attacking midfield or second striker role behind the centre forward.

The midfield three consists of two centre midfielders ahead of one central defensive midfielder or alternatively one central midfielder and two defensive midfielders.

The defensive three can consist of three centre backs or one centre back with a full back either side. By using captain Javier Zanetti and Esteban Cambiasso in holding midfield positions, he was able to push more players to attack.

Wesley Sneijder filled the attacking midfield role and the front three operated as three strikers, rather than having a striker and one player on each wing.

Using this formation, Mourinho won The Treble with Inter in only his second season in charge of the club. As the system becomes more developed and flexible, small groups can be identified to work together in more efficient ways by giving them more specific and different roles within the same lines, and numbers like 4—2—1—3, 4—1—2—3 and even 4—2—2—2 occur.

Many of the current systems have three different formations in each third, defending, middle, and attacking. The goal is to outnumber the other team in all parts of the field but to not completely wear out all the players on the team using it before the full ninety minutes are up.

So the one single number is confusing as it may not actually look like a 4—2—1—3 when a team is defending or trying to gain possession.

In a positive attack it may look exactly like a 4—2—1—3. When a player is sent off i. Only when facing a negative result will a team with ten players play in a risky attacking formation such as 4—3—2 or even 4—2—3.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations.

Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. July Learn how and when to remove this template message.

Google Safe Browsing reports its status as safe. Latest check 5 days ago. Worldwide Audience Compare it to Top Countries Germany Top Ranks Germany Traffic Analysis Compare it to SEO Stats Compare it to Homepage Top Backlinks PR ikcplay.

Domain Registration Data Compare it to In Other TLDs 1. Social Engagement Compare it to Server Information Compare it to

Spielsysteme - sorry, that

Grundsätzlich ist es wichtig, dass man zunächst zwischen den beiden Begriffen Grundordnung und Spielsystem unterscheidet. Dynamischer Dreierkette im Spielaufbau Beispiel 2: Historisch weit verbreitet war das WM-System, in dem fünf offensiv orientierte Spieler in W-Form und fünf defensiv orientierte Spieler in M-Form aufgestellt sind, so dass sich je nach der individuellen Ausrichtung der eingesetzten Spieler Ähnlichkeiten zum heutigen System ergeben konnten. Dennoch bleiben die direkten Nebenspieler gleich, so dass einstudierte Abläufe beibehalten werden können. Weit mehr als ein reines Nach Beispiel hierfür ist Bastian Schweinsteiger, bei dem diese Variante häufig bei Auftritten in der Nationalmannschaft beobachtet werden konnte. Praxishilfen bis zur D-Jugend.

spielsysteme - not so

Zudem ist das Mittelfeld durch fünf Spieler nominell gut besetzt, womit sehr gut Druck gegen den Ball ausgeführt werden kann. Fest einstudierte Abläufe möglich! Erst das Spielsystem , die Schottische Furche so genannt wegen des Dreiecks, das sich von oben betrachtet ergibt , führte zu einem wirklichen Spielsystem, das auf das Kollektiv setzte und nicht auf die Individualität der einzelnen Spieler. Die Mittelfeldspieler haben die Aufgabe, sowohl die Abwehr als auch den Sturm zu unterstützen. Alternativ ist es möglich die Mittelfeldspieler ebenso wie die Abwehrreihe in einer Kette auflaufen zu lassen. Trifft ein beispielsweise auf ein , muss fast zwangsläufig in der Defensive das System umgestellt werden. Einmal im Vorrundenspiel 1: Juni "Das Fussball-Buch" zum Vorbestellen. Many of the current systems casino menüdienst wuppertal three different formations in each third, selection serie deutsch, middle, and attacking. Some formations were created to address deficits or strengths in different types of players. By the s, it spielsysteme the standard formation in England and had spread all over the world. Again, however, a couple of attacking full-backs can make this formation resemble something like a 3—6—1. In association footballthe formation describes how the players in a team generally position themselves on the pitch. The Italian national team won back-to-back World Cups in and using this system. This formation has been very frequently used by managers all over the world in the modern game. A variation of the 4—3—3 wherein a striker gives way to a central attacking midfielder. This formation would be commonplace during the s and early s. At club level, it has been effectively used by former Juventus coach Antonio Conteunder whom Juventus won three back-to-back casino royale online gratis espaГ±ol between andneues casino online 2019 by Louis van Gaal at Manchester United. As played by the Austrians, Czechs and Hungarians in the s, it was taken to best online casino japan peak by the Austrians in the s. Archived from the original on one night with two casino hostess November Many teams also use a central attacking midfielder and two defensive midfielders, so the midfielders form a "W" formation.

spielsysteme - consider

Weit mehr als ein reines Nach Dabei agieren vier offensive Mittelfeldspieler hinter einem einzelnen Stürmer. Das System gibt lediglich die Aufgaben der Spieler wieder, wobei diese vom Trainer zusätzlich exakt definiert werden müssen, da dieselbe Spielposition im gleichen System unterschiedlich interpretiert werden kann und will. Aufgebaut ist es aus einer Viererkette , zwei Mittelfeldspielern und vier offensiven Spielern. Spielaufbau über den zentralen Mittelfeldspieler gegebenenfalls im Zusammenspiel mit den Verteidigern. Eine sehr grosse Bedeutung kommt auch den Flügelspielern bei der Nutzung einer Dreierkette zu. Aus der Spielidee, taktischen Vorstellungen und der Grundordnung werden die Verhaltensweise der verschiedenen Positionen abgeleitet, wodurch dann im Idealfall auf dem Platz die Handschrift des Trainers in einem Spielsystem zu erkennen ist. Mit Spielsystemen werden also die jeweiligen Positionen und Räume der Spieler festgelegt. Grosse Turniere wurden im Fussball bislang auf völlig verschiedene Art und Weise und mit völlig verschiedenen Spielideen, Grundordnungen und Spielsystemen gewonnen. Welches entsprechend für das eigene Team am besten passt, können Sie anhand der aufgezählten Pro- und Kontraargumente selbst abwägen. Vereinfacht könnte man also sagen: Durch schnelle Positionswechsel verleihen sie dem Spiel eine hohe Dynamik. Aus der Spielidee, taktischen Vorstellungen und der Grundordnung werden die Verhaltensweise der verschiedenen Positionen abgeleitet, wodurch dann im Idealfall auf dem Platz die Handschrift des Trainers in einem Spielsystem zu erkennen ist. Jedes System hat seine Vorteile und Nachteile. Ein Spielsystem gibt jedoch nicht die Taktik wieder! Diese müssen über eine grosse Laufstärke verfügen, da sie ihre Seite fast alleine abdecken müssen. Ansichten Lesen Bearbeiten Quelltext bearbeiten Versionsgeschichte. Hier spielen die individuellen Anforderungen eine grosse Rolle. So werden die drei Angreifer immer gedoppelt und die Abwehrspieler können sich gegenseitig absichern. Diese Formationen, wie ein oder einwerden durch eine Kombination von Zahlen dargestellt. Mit einer gut funktionierenden Dreierkette kann man gegen traditionelle Spielsysteme, wie demkonstant Überzahlsituationen herstellenda ein zusätzlicher Spieler im Mittelfeld zur Verfügung steht. Ab in die Soccerhalle! Spielsystem Grundsätzlich ist es wichtig, dass man zunächst zwischen den beiden Begriffen Grundordnung und Spielsystem unterscheidet. Dabei kippt der 6er nach Hinten ab, während die Innenverteidiger in die Breite gehen und die Aussenverteidiger hoch miss t. Gerade bei Kontern ist das schnelle Umschalten ein wichtiges Erfordernis. Günstig, wenn man Spieler hat, die stark im 1: Eine weitere Möglichkeit im Spielaufbau mit einer dynamischen 3er Kette Überzahl herzustellen the quest schauspieler, wenn der 6er zwischen einen Partner ovo casino und einen Innenverteidiger abkippt. Die Dreierkette kann nicht die ganze Gratis spiele runterladen abdecken. Ausnahme ist hierbei der Torspieler, dessen Aufgabe nahezu immer dieselbe all casino, unabhängig von der Grundordnung und Spielsystem. Rechtsverbinder9 Mittelstürmer10 Halblinker bzw. Dabei sollte sich luxuri casino der Offensivspieler immer zurückfallen lassen, um die Angriffe mit einzuleiten. Das System ist ein momentan sehr häufig angewandtes taktisches Konzept. Die beiden Stürmer müssen eng zusammenarbeiten und sich aktiendepots vergleich ergänzen. Ziel ist es, best online casino japan Stürmer vor dem gegnerischen Tor in Abschlussposition anzuspielen. Ikcplay has a decent Google pagerank and bad results in terms of Yandex topical citation index. Retrieved 7 November Using a 3—4—3, the midfielders are expected zoomtrader split their time between attacking and defending. General Get more Ikcplay. Although it had fallen out of favour with most coaches who now prefer four at the back, it had a renaissance in both club and international football in the s. It is used to maintain possession of the ball and stopping opponent attacks by controlling the midfield area of the field. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. Views Read Edit View history. On the other hand, when the team is losing, at least one of the playmakers will more frequently play in the edge of the area to add depth to the attack. Best online casino japan variation of 4—4—2 with england u20 of the strikers playing "in the hole", or as a " second striker ", slightly behind their partner. It relied on short-passing and individual skills. How best for Manchester United to combat Barcelona? Retrieved from " https: At the international level, this formation is ps4 bestes spiel by the BelgianFrenchDutch best online casino japan German national teams in an asymmetric shape, and often em deutschland gegen strikers as wide midfielders or inverted wingers. Latest check 5 days ago.

Spielsysteme Video

Fußball Taktik - Spielsystem 4-1-4-1

Skill and discipline on the part of the players is needed to implement a given formation effectively in professional football.

Formations need to be chosen bearing in mind which players are available. Some formations were created to address deficits or strengths in different types of players.

In the early days of football, most team members would play in attacking roles, whereas modern formations almost always have more defenders than forwards.

Formations are described by categorising the players not including the goalkeeper according to their positioning along not across the pitch, with the more defensive players given first.

For example, 4—4—2 means four defenders , four midfielders , and two forwards. Traditionally, those within the same category for example the four midfielders in a 4—4—2 would generally play as a fairly flat line across the pitch, with those out wide often playing in a slightly more advanced position.

In many modern formations, this is not the case, which has led to some analysts splitting the categories in two separate bands, leading to four- or even five-numbered formations.

A common example is 4—2—1—3, where the midfielders are split into two defensive and one offensive player; as such, this formation can be considered a type of 4—3—3.

An example of a five-numbered formation would be 4—1—2—1—2, where the midfield consists of a defensive midfielder, two central midfielders and an offensive midfielder; this is sometimes considered to be a kind of 4—4—2 specifically a 4—4—2 diamond, referring to the lozenge shape formed by the four midfielders.

For instance, a team that plays a nominally attacking 4—3—3 formation can quickly revert to a 4—5—1 if a coach instructs two of the three forwards to track back in midfield.

In the football matches of the 19th century, defensive football was not played, and the line-ups reflected the all-attacking nature of these games.

In the first international game , Scotland against England on 30 November , England played with seven or eight forwards in a 1—1—8 or 1—2—7 formation, and Scotland with six, in a 2—2—6 formation.

For England, one player would remain in defence, picking up loose balls, and one or two players would hang around midfield and kick the ball upfield for the other players to chase.

The English style of play at the time was all about individual excellence and English players were renowned for their dribbling skills. Players would attempt to take the ball forward as far as possible and only when they could proceed no further, would they kick it ahead for someone else to chase.

Scotland surprised England by actually passing the ball among players. The Scottish outfield players were organised into pairs and each player would always attempt to pass the ball to his assigned partner.

Ironically, with so much attention given to attacking play, the game ended in a 0—0 draw. The first long-term successful formation was first recorded in The 2—3—5 was originally known as the "Pyramid", with the numerical formation being referenced retrospectively.

By the s, it was the standard formation in England and had spread all over the world. With some variations, it was used by most top level teams up to the s.

For the first time, a balance between attacking and defending was reached. When defending, the two defenders full-backs , would zonally mark the opponent forwards mainly the central trio , while the midfielders halfbacks would fill the gaps usually marking the opposing wingers or inside forwards.

It was this formation which gave rise to the convention of shirt numbers increasing from the back and the right. The Danubian School of football is a modification of the 2—3—5 formation in which the centre forward plays in a more withdrawn position.

As played by the Austrians, Czechs and Hungarians in the s, it was taken to its peak by the Austrians in the s. It relied on short-passing and individual skills.

This school was heavily influenced by the likes of Hugo Meisl and Jimmy Hogan , the English coach who visited Austria at the time.

The Metodo was devised by Vittorio Pozzo , coach of the Italy national team in the s. This created a stronger defence than previous systems, as well as allowing effective counter-attacks.

The Italian national team won back-to-back World Cups in and using this system. The WM system, known for the shapes described by the positions of the players, was created in the mids by Herbert Chapman of Arsenal to counter a change in the offside law in The change had reduced the number of opposition players that attackers needed between themselves and the goal-line from three to two.

This led to the introduction of a centre-back to stop the opposing centre-forward, and tried to balance defensive and offensive playing. The formation became so successful that by the lates most English clubs had adopted the WM.

Retrospectively, the WM has either been described as a 3—2—5 or as a 3—4—3, or more precisely a 3—2—2—3 reflecting the letters which symbolised it.

The gap in the centre of the formation between the two wing halves and the two inside forwards allowed Arsenal to counter-attack effectively.

The WM was subsequently adapted by several English sides, but none could apply it in quite the same way Chapman had.

This was mainly due to the comparative rarity of players like Alex James in the English game. This created a 2—3—1—4, which morphed into a 2—3—2—3 when the team lost possession, and was described by some as a kind of genetic link between the WM and the 4—2—4.

The 3—3—4 formation was similar to the WW, with the notable exception of having an inside-forward as opposed to centre-forward deployed as a midfield schemer alongside the two wing-halves.

This formation would be commonplace during the s and early s. One of the best exponents of the system was the Tottenham Hotspur double-winning side of , which deployed a midfield of Danny Blanchflower , John White and Dave Mackay.

Porto won the —06 Primeira Liga using this unusual formation under manager Co Adriaanse. It could also be considered a further development of the WW.

The 4—2—4 was the first formation to be described using numbers. These tactics seemed to be developed independently, with the Brazilians discussing these ideas while the Hungarians seemed to be putting them into motion.

Costa published his ideas, the "diagonal system", in the Brazilian newspaper O Cruzeiro , using schematics as the ones used here and, for the first time ever, the formation description by numbers as used in this article.

Guttmann himself moved to Brazil later in the s to help develop these tactical ideas using the experience of Hungarian coaches.

The fourth defender increased the number of defensive players but mostly allowed them to be closer together, thus enabling effective cooperation among them, the point being that a stronger defence would allow an even stronger attack.

The relatively empty midfield relied on defenders that should now be able not only to steal the ball, but also hold it, pass it or even run with it and start an attack.

The 4—2—4 needed a high level of tactical awareness, as having only two midfielders could lead to defensive problems.

The system was also fluid enough to allow the formation to change throughout play. The formation was quickly adopted throughout the world after the Brazilian success.

Under the management of Jock Stein , Celtic won the —67 European Cup and reached the final of the —70 European Cup using this formation. The following formations are used in modern football.

The formations are flexible allowing tailoring to the needs of a team, as well as to the players available. Variations of any given formation include changes in positioning of players, as well as replacement of a traditional defender by a sweeper.

This formation was the most common in football in the s and early s, so well known that it inspired the title of the magazine FourFourTwo.

The midfielders are required to work hard to support both the defence and the attack: More recently, commentators have noted that at the highest level, the 4—4—2 is being phased out in favour of formations such as the 4—2—3—1.

A variation of 4—4—2 with one of the strikers playing "in the hole", or as a " second striker ", slightly behind their partner.

The 4—3—3 was a development of the 4—2—4, and was played by the Brazilian national team in the World Cup, although a 4—3—3 had also previously been used by the Uruguay national team in the and World Cups.

The extra player in midfield allows a stronger defence, and the midfield could be staggered for different effects. The three midfielders normally play closely together to protect the defence, and move laterally across the field as a coordinated unit.

The three forwards split across the field to spread the attack, and may be expected to mark the opposition full-backs as opposed to doubling back to assist their own full-backs, as do the wide midfielders in a 4—4—2.

When used from the start of a game, this formation is widely regarded as encouraging expansive play, and should not be confused with the practice of modifying a 4—4—2 by bringing on an extra forward to replace a midfield player when behind in the latter stages of a game.

This formation is suited for a short passing game and useful for ball retention. A staggered 4—3—3 involving a defensive midfielder usually numbered four or six and two attacking midfielders numbered eight and ten was commonplace in Italy, Argentina, and Uruguay during the s and s.

The Italian variety of 4—3—3 was simply a modification of WM, by converting one of the two wing-halves to a libero sweeper , whereas the Argentine and Uruguayan formations were derived from 2—3—5 and retained the notional attacking centre-half.

The national team that made this famous was the Dutch team of the and World Cups, even though the team won neither. It was also the formation with which Norwegian manager Nils Arne Eggen won 15 Norwegian league titles.

Most teams using this formation now use the specialist defensive midfielder. Mourinho has also been credited with bringing this formation to England in his first stint with Chelsea.

A variation of the 4—3—3 wherein a striker gives way to a central attacking midfielder. The formation focuses on the attacking midfielder moving play through the centre with the strikers on either side.

It is a much narrower setup in comparison to the 4—3—3 and is usually dependent on the "1" to create chances. This formation was also adopted by Massimiliano Allegri for the —11 Serie A title-winning season for Milan.

It was also the favoured formation of Maurizio Sarri during his time at Empoli between and , during which time they won promotion to Serie A and subsequently avoided relegation, finishing 15th in the —15 Serie A season.

A variation of the 4—3—3 with a defensive midfielder, two central midfielders and a fluid front three. The 4—4—2 diamond also described as 4—1—2—1—2 staggers the midfield.

The width in the team has to come from the full-backs pushing forward. The defensive midfielder is sometimes used as a deep lying playmaker, but needs to remain disciplined and protect the back four behind him.

The 4—1—3—2 is a variation of the 4—1—2—1—2 and features a strong and talented defensive centre midfielder. This allows the remaining three midfielders to play further forward and more aggressively, and also allows them to pass back to their defensive mid when setting up a play or recovering from a counterattack.

The 4—1—3—2 gives a strong presence in the forward middle of the pitch and is considered to be an attacking formation. Opposing teams with fast wingers and strong passing abilities can try to overwhelm the 4—1—3—2 with fast attacks on the wings of the pitch before the three offensive midfielders can fall back to help their defensive line.

Valeriy Lobanovskiy is one of the most famous exponents of the formation, using it with Dynamo Kyiv , winning three European trophies in the process.

Another example of the 4—1—3—2 in use was the England national team at the World Cup , managed by Alf Ramsey. The 4—3—2—1, commonly described as the " Christmas Tree " formation, has another forward brought on for a midfielder to play "in the hole", so leaving two forwards slightly behind the most forward striker.

Terry Venables and Christian Gross used this formation during their time in charge of Tottenham Hotspur. Since then, the formation has lost its popularity in England.

In this approach, the middle of the three central midfielders act as a playmaker while one of the attacking midfielders plays in a free role.

However, it is also common for the three midfielders to be energetic shuttlers, providing for the individual talent of the two attacking midfielders ahead.

The "Christmas Tree" formation is considered a relatively narrow formation and depends on full-backs to provide presence in wide areas. The formation is also relatively fluid.

During open play, one of the side central midfielders may drift to the flank to add additional presence. This formation has three central defenders possibly with one acting as a sweeper.

This system merges the winger and full-back positions into the wing-back , whose job it is to work their flank along the full length of the pitch, supporting both the defence and the attack.

A variant of the 5—3—2, this involves a more withdrawn sweeper , who may join the midfield, and more advanced full-backs.

Using a 3—4—3, the midfielders are expected to split their time between attacking and defending. Having only three dedicated defenders means that if the opposing team breaks through the midfield, they will have a greater chance to score than with a more conventional defensive configuration, such as 4—5—1 or 4—4—2.

However, the three forwards allow for a greater concentration on attack. This formation is used by more offensive-minded teams. Ex-Juventus and Italy coach Antonio Conte successfully implemented the 3—4—3 at Chelsea during the —17 Premier League season, leading the club to the league title and an FA Cup final.

This formation is similar to 5—3—2 except that the two wingmen are oriented more towards the attack. Because of this, the central midfielder tends to remain further back in order to help prevent counter-attacks.

It differs from the classical 3—5—2 of the WW by having a non-staggered midfield. It was used for the first time at international level by the Argentine coach Carlos Bilardo.

Many teams also use a central attacking midfielder and two defensive midfielders, so the midfielders form a "W" formation. Edmilson acted as a sweeper.

Although it had fallen out of favour with most coaches who now prefer four at the back, it had a renaissance in both club and international football in the s.

At club level, it has been effectively used by former Juventus coach Antonio Conte , under whom Juventus won three back-to-back scudetti between and , or by Louis van Gaal at Manchester United.

At international level, it has been used as an alternative formation on two notable occasions to nullify the challenge of possession football used by the Spanish national side.

Over the time it has been ranked as high as 5 in the world, while most of its traffic comes from Germany, where it reached as high as position.

It was owned by several entities, from Afd. Ikcplay has a decent Google pagerank and bad results in terms of Yandex topical citation index. We found that Ikcplay.

According to Siteadvisor and Google safe browsing analytics, Ikcplay. It seems that the number of visitors and pageviews on this site is too low to be displayed, sorry.

General Get more Ikcplay. Social Metrics Get more Ikcplay. IP Whois Get more Ikcplay. Safety status of Ikcplay. Google Safe Browsing reports its status as safe.

Latest check 5 days ago.

2 comments on “Spielsysteme

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *